Lower static weight, but more weight in the head to compensate. However, if you don’t produce quite as much racket head speed, or you have one shot where you struggle to produce racket head speed then it might be worth looking at the Tour. Score. My frame is 10.8 ounces unstrung and I like that weight. Also spinwise. Lighter than the Gravity Pro, this racquet comes through contact very quickly and maintains a lot of control so you can play with a lot more confidence. The Gravity is more forgiving, even with TourBite string. I enjoyed it so I purchased it. This is great for players who enjoy 18 x 20 string patterns but still want to get a little bit of free power out of the strings. Thanks. Ive had many Head racquets in the past. Leistung führt! And the Gravity feels so good at impact :)) Am I right that it has higher power level even though its denser string pattern? Jonas – on the Tour and MP versions what is your estimate of their respective swing weights, and what about launch angle? Volleys are knife sharp. The two rackets are very similar in many ways. They are completely different racquets. I find them very sluggish do move around, especially when returning serve on my backhand side. Great job from HEAD. There will be some big servers out there who want something a bit heavier, but for the majority of us, the Gravity Tour does the job. The Head Radical Pro Paddle includes many of the same features used in the Radical Tour. There are clear markings where to tie off your mains and crosses. Required fields are marked *. I need your help. And talking a about stability e confort between HGravity Pro and Tour? Hi Jonas, I am considering to change to Gravity Tour from Angell V3 TC100. Im a regular, recreational player, Im almost 60 and ive been playing since i was 15. Head Gravity Tour Graphene 360+ Compare. For me personally, I’m used to the 18 x 20 string patterns, so it was an easy change to get used to the Gravity Tour. Compare. It is great on serves, slice, offered decent topspin despite the tight pattern, has a comfortable feel, works well even when you flat out the ball. That’s a great racquet that I used for a few years. I like the feel of my current racquet and can maneouvre it around fine. They’re both very good rackets, and there’s not too much between them, so it’s one where you’ve got to give it a go yourself. Thanks for your previous answers to posters regarding the clash. Would like to try an 18×20 and this looks good! Coming from RF97 and PS97 CV 315g the transition was made very fast and I truly love the direct connection this stick provides to me, it’s just pinpoint Tennis. Babolat Pure Strike 16x19 3rd Gen. The short demo felt the RHS speed suffer, but unsure if it’s because I need to get used to it.. on the flip side, in a tournament if you’re tired that’ll get even harder! I loved to play with Head Graphene Youtek Radical Pro but moved to Head Speed Pro 360+ because tennis elbow. The 22 millimeter beam offers a good amount of punching power, but with a more controlled feel at contact than the MP. The Tour fills the gap between the 11.0 ounce Mid Plus and the substantially heavier 11.7 ounce Pro model. Mentre la MP è più scarica e leggerina ancora, ma più votata a fare battaglia con una Clash 100 … You might have tried this, but I would first look at how I could change the string set up to fit my needs. The 18 x 20 string pattern provides the control, but the racket flexes in such ways as to give you great comfort and feel too. Easier to transition to for someone coming from a Wilson Blade or Tecnifibre Tfight XTC 305. The Head Gravity Pro/Tour tennis racquet comes with a flip design and a teardrop-shaped head which effectively enlarges the sweet spot. The Gravity Tour is 10g lighter than the Pro, coming in at 305g unstrung, which puts it in direct competition with rackets like the Pure Strike (18 x 20) and Prince Phantom Pro 100 (18 x 20). A revolutionary frame design combined with advanced GRAPHENE 360+ technology and a massive sweetspot to dominate play. I just forgot Will check tomorrow! It can be the case that different players find different rackets suit their swings maneuverability-wise. Wilson Clash 98. I am a tennis player that is always looking for the holly grail (but I still haven’t found what i’m looking for) that can give me a better performance. What a racket… Ordered another 2 and switching to Head… Pain in my heart but the level of control is phenominal. In terms of competing with its direct rivals like the Babolat Pure Strike, I thought performance-wise it was right there, the big area where the Gravity Tour has started to pull ahead is the comfort levels. Buy the HEAD Gravity MP. Dunlop SX 300 Tour. I could not really find a shot where I did not like the HEAD Gravity. I am totally cured, have easy spin and maneuverability but definitely I miss the control and precision of the Radical. This racket doesn’t make it that easy to get spin, but that’s how I prefer it. Pronti all’uscita quest’estate hanno un’aria molto tecnica. Radical graphene touch was appalling, but the new 360 line is great (particularly the 360 Speed). Thanks! Last year I tried the Head Speed but did not connect to it and did not feel comfortable playing with it. Tourbite 1.20 mm at 52 pounds and it hits the spot for me. I haven’t played much for the latter 20 years so the bigger head will be a bonus!! If you want a little more maneuverability then the Tour is that bit lighter, but if you’ve got strong, fast swings, then I would lean towards the Pro. I have played with Blade v7 16-19 for couple of moths. Any thoughts you might share comparing the – Gravity Pro vs the new Pure Strike 98 18×20? Ive used Head Intellitour Strings at 55lb on each restring as thats what it came with originally. Head Gravity è una linea di telai piuttosto interessante, che propone telai dal piatto da 100 pollici, ma abbinate a caratteristiche da telaio classico. I have really enjoyed the Graphene 360 racquets and played some of my best tennis with them, but sometimes I have been nostalgic about the feel of my older HEAD racquets. When I went for my most ambitious shots I wanted the extra weight of the Gravity Pro and that reflects in my scores for the two rackets. I am torm between the 2 Gravity Racquets ( Pro and Tour) and the Graphene 360 Speed Pro. Thank you for this nice review! Thanks for your comment. If that fails, then the Gravity Tour could be a good fit though. It features the same polypropylene core and the same dimensions. I’m wondering how does the Gravity Pro compares to the Prince Textreme 100 Tour? The Gravity MP is the easiest to use of them all – the Gravity Pro the most difficult. Spin, pop, comfort and feel are the Gravity's strong points. I do feel the Pro for some reason is pretty hefty and I’m normally coming from hefty sticks. The Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Tour provides a great alternative to the Gravity Pro and is more than capable of competing with its rivals. Hi German, Yes, I know. This Tour model is equipped with a 645cm² head size in order to ensure additional tolerance and versatility. Great review as ever! It will be more difficult to swing fast though. I actually quite like the name of the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Tour because it doesn’t have too much going on in it, but what’s the distinction between Tour and Pro? I have the same issue with both, but of course it’s more noticeable on the heavier one. This is not the case with HEAD Gravity. Julie - "I hit with the Head Gravity Pro to compare it to the Gravity MP. Since you are familiar with both frames, I was wondering how they compared and which one you favor. Hi Can you compare the new Head prestige tour/mp and Gravity pro/mp ? Before we get into scores I want to compare the different models. Hi Jack, The Prince racquet I am enjoying is the Prince Textreme Tour 100 that I recently reviewed. Thank you , Hi, I offer a consultation service if you want more detailed help: https://tennisnerd.net/product/consultation-racquet-and-string-advice. Meanwhile I‘ve played several hours with it and still I‘m very keen testing Head Gravity Tour again. It’s a little bit easier to get into position than the Gravity Pro which is helpful when the balls coming at you quickly which is a plus. towards the Pro. I am not sure which one I like more at the moment. Just wondering if you’re planning on following-up your First Impressions review on the Gravity line. Compared to the Gravity Pro (which also has an 18x20 string pattern), this racquet is lighter and faster. I prefer the Pro so that is what I would recommend. Gravity PRO . HEAD Gravity S – great for beginner to intermediates that want a larger head size and a light weight. I am still playing with though and should perhaps create a finalized review post. Hi Andrés, Thanks! Have you tried the HEAD Gravity racquets? Cheers / J. and is a a big difference, Hi Jonas, thanks a million for the playtest information. It is not necessary to use a saw to check if they are full of foam, just remove the lid of the butcap you can check if they are filled or not !!! I think the weight difference is probably your biggest consideration here. How would you compare the Gravity Pro and Prestige MP? Which do you prefer: Wilson Ultra Tour 18 x 20 or HEAD Gravity Pro? The Pro, which Alexander Zverev endorses, is my personal favorite of the Gravity line so far, but all the ones I’ve tested have been very good racquets. The closest to the DR 98 would probably be the Gravity MP. thx. maybe less aggresive version of the K7 Lime? There are no shared holes and the mains end at the throat (ideal for ATW). Though it is slightly less head light, the Gravity Tour handles sizzling passing shots with ease, and is easier to keep in proper volleying position thanks to the reduced weight. I would say you might get a little bit more maneuverability for the Gravity Tour, the real thing is just how it feels for you when you’re playing with it. Despite 18×20 level of spin is just as good as the v7 blade, perhaps slightly better because of the ease of playing this racket. Are you excited too? In the end, from reading your comment, I would go with the Tour. Forehand and backhand are significantly more stable. How does the Gravity Pro compare to the Prince Phantom Pro 90p? I believe the Gravity Pro version has a beefy swing weight but perhaps a bit too much for my taste, the Tour might be a bit easier to generate racket head speed with but will it pack a punch without lead? The 18×20 pattern on the Tour was a bit disappointing – was hoping for 16×20 or 18×19 but perhaps it is a fairly open 18×20 with a not too low launch angle? If you’re the former, then you’re going to prefer this Gravity Tour to the Gravity Pro. Not as stable as the Tour and Pro. How does this compare with Head graphene 360 speed pro? Hi, tks for such a good review of the 3 rackets. Thanks for pointing this out, I kept getting the names mixed up! What do you think makes it worse at generating spin than pro? what is more control oriented: the head speed pro 360+ or the gravity tour 360+. I am very close to purchasing the Dunlop CX 200 Tour 18×20, but am intrigued by the Gravity Pro as a lover of old Head frames. The HEAD Gravity brags about a “massive sweet spot” and this comes from the more rounded head shape which reminds me of the HEAD IG Extreme Pro 2.0 or something like a Prince Phantom racquet. I would like to try it out myself! I was never visually happy to play with a more rounded racquet, but this one does not bother me as much (it is a bit less extreme in shape). I think this racket is going to do best in the hands of someone with quite an advanced game, but in terms of game style, it’s very adaptable. Everything about this racquet is geared toward providing players with maximum control. Last, (but not least for some), I want to say that I really like the idea with the neon colors and the green paint on one side and the red on the other. Could you uncover the mystery ??? I play with Yonex ezone DR 98 and I like arm friendly technology. If the racket gives you too much easy spin then it’s easy to lose control of the ball, I’d rather have to work for the spin and keep the control. The Clash is more muted, while the Gravity will be more “connected” to the ball. We won't be doing a post about the lighter models unless we receive enough inquiries. Did you compare these sticks already, what’s your take on them, how would you rate them? di Mauro Simoncini | 17 luglio 2019 I just want to point out here that the actual “sweet spot”, meaning the optimal position in the racquet head to hit the ball, does not variate much from different racquets, but the “sweet area” where you have more margin for error on off-center hits varies quite a bit. Sounds great! Hi, tks for such a good review. My Gravity Tour should be with me mid next week and I can’t wait testing it out again with my string setup. Built with Graphene 360+, the Gravity Tour combines the stability and power of Graphene 360 with SpiralFibers in the lower head for a cleaner feel at impact. Overall, this was another great playtest. The Gravity Tour has everything I look for on the serve and this resulted in a great serving performance from me. I like your review of Pure Strike 16×19 3rd, Wilson V7 16×19 and Head Gravity Tour. If I would choose one of them it would be the Gravity MP. Does it have flexibility, like Wilson Crush 100, where the shaft bends? If you’re more accustomed to the lighter racket then it’s likely you could find the Tour to offer more spin though. I’m a pro player and I can’t find the right racket for me. The heft, the control, it was all right at home for me. Lots of good 18×20 options, so I want to make the choice that’ll help my game. So not a rebrand. Hi Jonas! My favorite of the bunch and a contestant for next racquet of choice for me. I hit very well off both sides, playing with good depth and generally feeling confident on all the shots I attempted. Thanks! The extra maneuverability and pop really make for a good experience on serve and you can crank the MPH. But you will be able to take balls better on the rise and block back defensive shots. Hello good day!!! Last year I tried the Head Speed but did not connect to it and did not feel comfortable playing with it. More spin-friendly than the Tour and the Pro and a good choice for a wide group of players. The Gravity Pro seems an almost carbon copy of the Head IG Speed MP 18×20 specwise. how would you compare the gravity pro to the extreme pro? How have you customized your Head Gravity MP? At the end of the day though, you’ve got an excellent racket whichever you choose. Compare. People have been asking me to bring back scores to the review and I will make an effort to do that. and what type of player?????? One serve that I found I was hitting particularly well with the Gravity Tour was my leftie slider out wide. The 8 extra grams just does something extra as well. I loved gravity tour but I had hard time with manuerverability. Your email address will not be published. Liked the control, would prefer more maneuverability and like to get a little bit more in power department not (too much though) The Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Pro is one of the latest additions to the Head family of tennis racquets that delivers control, stability, and comfort. I’m a all round player who likes to build the point on the baseline and attack the net when possible (should do that more often). Kind regards Nikolaus. The coils measured 24 feet 1 inch (mains) and 19 feet 7 inches (crosses). Now HEAD has given us one more Gravity to choose from this holiday season; the Gravity Tour. It’s difficult to give you a definitive answer because it’s really going to come down to how they feel when you get them in your hands. HEAD Graphene 360+ Gravity Tour v Pro Tennis Racket review by pdhsports.com With the release of the new Head Gravity range, our pdhsports.com tennis experts and local club level playtesters were excited to be able to take the range on court in advance of the official launch. The HEAD Gravity line has been hyped up quite a bit with marketing lingo such as “New force, New game”, “The Force is Coming”, “Massive Sweet Spot Dominates the Game” and so on. Can you compare Head Speed 360 pro and Gravity 360+ pro? I’m changed too many. Serving, it’s less powerful than the Pure Strike 18×20, more powerful than Wilson Ultra Tour. At the end of the day, this is a personal thing, but at the highest levels, I do think this gives the Gravity Pro a little bit more potential. I prefer the heft of the Gravity Pro, but these play very closely. I felt like the Head Speed Pro had changed quite a bit and it had left a gap that needed to be filled in. Hope this helps. So after the review i also gave the tour a try and what should i say: Im in love!!! The spin potential of this racket is not huge, and you’ve got to have good swings to get good RPMs on the ball. which one give better feel ? If you want, control, feel, maneuverability, and comfort then this is a racket you need to look at. The Instinct MP is a little stiff. Several report the problem with poor quality control for these frames which also speaks to choosing the Tour version which leaves more room for customizations. I used to play official tournaments in Portugal, and now, after a few years off, I’m planning to enter the senior (Age 44) ranking next year. Compare. If you want a racquet that is faster through the air, go for the Dunlop CX 200 Tour! This racquet is lighter than the Pro version. Hello, ma inerzia davvero considerevole (336) per una racchetta in sintesi potente (53) ma anche di controllo (46) con una maneggevolezza abbastanza bassa, ma tipica della categoria (63). The main thing is getting out there and playing some tennis with them before you commit. Im still currently playing with a Head iPrestige Mid 600. I think the Gravity Tour or Wilson Clash Tour are good options. We noted this in our playtest. Gravity Pro . My feeling is that the Pro will be a bit too heavy for you to enjoy so I would recommend checking out the Prince Textreme Tour 310. Not a Pure Drive by any means, but a more forgiving player racquet. Specs on mine are Head Size 93 – this will be a big change for me going forward as Ive never played with a bigger head than this, Strungweight 12.1 oz Length 27 ins Balance 5 points Head Light Swingweight 320 Stiffness 60 Beamwidth 19mm. We really wanted to maximize the control of the 18 x 20 string pattern with this setup whilst still allowing for plenty of spin potential. The Gravity Pro is more of a control-oriented player stick, while the Clash gives you easier access to power and spin at the cost of some control and feel. I’m currently using the K7 Lime, and really enjoying it. Although I feel like it might need a little more plough and maybe just a tiny bit more of a modern feel. The naming of racquets is never easy and it is hard to explain what makes a “Pro” racquet and what makes a “Tour” racquet but in lack of better words, it has just become standard in the racquet industry. Hi Jonas, I’ve been using the Prestige MP for almost a decade. That is all marketing of course, but what is really behind their new racquet line? Head Graphene 360 Radical Pro. Thanks for the review (as always – great job) – the one you did for Tecnifibre TF40 305 got me seriously thinking about that racket. but I understand it’s not available. After stringing, the mains measured 1.37 mm per side and the crosses diameter measured 1.16 mm. The biggest Problem for me was that after 1 hour match time i get a really tired arm and the quality of my game decreased. We gave the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Tour a 9 out of 10 for groundstrokes. PS. I was loving serving with the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Tour. I like HEAD Hawk Touch or Lynx Anthracite in the Gravity. Hi Tennisnerd, how would you compare this to the DR98? Please share any string tips for this racket if you have… The only minor point was the serve, no significant change from the v7 blade. HEAD Gravity Tour – plays quite close to the Pro but with a bit less weight in the handle and a thicker beam for slightly more power. The bigger sweetspot(i came from the prestige pro) really help me with my game and the feel is so nice and i have no Problems to swing the stick the hole match. Not sure what the plus stands for, but since these racquets feel less hollow and more comfortable than the Graphene 360, I think it might be some kind of foam filling or other dampening material inside the frame. After doing this HEAD Gravity racquet review I can sincerely say that I am impressed by the performance. Hi Jonas How do these Head gravity’s compare with arm friendly racquets? Hi Paul, The Volkl V1 Pro is a good racquet, based on what you write, I think the Tour would be a good option, but as you write it is not easily available. Is the head shape of this racquet different from pro? I only have one question after reading about pro and tour racquets. Does this line feel weight polarized like the Radicals? There are more racquets in the line such as the S, MP Lite, but these are the ones I have tested. Hey Jonas, great review as always – many thanks! Any thoughts on how these compare to the K7 lime? Head Gravity, Prince Tour, Wilson Clash… Haaaaaa! This is a big contrast to your review, which praises its maneuverability… Wondering why our impressions might be so off? Buy the HEAD Gravity MP Lite. Graphene 360+ is Head's Graphene 360 combined with the all new Spiralfiber technology.Spiralfibers are at the base of the head and untwist and flex on impact adding to the … The Gravity Pro gives you a bit better control and a higher swing weight so more stability. Do you have a particular favourite as you gave both a good review. Thanks, James. I guess at the end of the day it’s just marketing so we’ve got to go out and do the playtest to tell you which one is which! Head Size: 100 in² / 645 cm² Length: 27in / 68,5cm Strung Weight: 332g / 11,7oz Unstrung Weight: 315g/11,1oz Balance: 32,39cm / 6 pts HL Swingweight: 332 String Pattern: 18 Mains / 20 Crosses Here is a closer look at the specifications of the Head Radical Pro Pickleball Paddle: Weighs 8.1 ounces; 16 x 7 7/8 inches Hi Ed, They are very arm-friendly racquets. Click Here to get the Head Graphene 360+ Gravity Pro For The Best Price From RacquetGuys! The mains measured 1.41 mm per side (the equivalent gauge in a cylindrical string would be 1.25mm, but with 25 percent less cross-sectional area), and the crosses diameter measured 1.18 mm prior to stringing. We find the demo thing is quite a big problem for many of our visitors which is frustrating. We put the Gravity in the hands of one of our testers, Owen, who had also played with both the Head Radical Pro and the Radical Tour. That being said I usually gravitate between Wilson Prostaf 97 tour (not the countervail), Yonex DR98 (which I sold recently… big mistake) and a Babolat Pure Strike 16/19. It worked best on my backhand. He really enjoyed these racquets. We recorded a string bed stiffness of 79 RDC units immediately after stringing at 60 pounds in a Wilson Pro Staff 6.1 95 (16 x 18 … There are lot of people who are going to find this racket really supplements their game nicely and you get the added bonus of great comfort. I’m still using the 2014 Graphene model and am looking into buying the newest version. Stringing up the Head Gravity MP was a breeze; I opted for an “Around The World” (ATW) method. thanks. Difference between Head Prestige Pro and this Gravity Pro? Score: 90/100 for me, HEAD Gravity Tour – plays quite close to the Pro but with a bit less weight in the handle and a thicker beam for slightly more power. The HEAD Gravity racquet series is the new force in the game. Thank You. “The Gravity Pro is 10g lighter than the Tour, coming in at 305g unstrung…” Let’s look at the specs of the different models: Head size: 100 sq inches Length: 27 inches (standard) Weight: 315 grams unstrung Balance: 31,5 cm unstrung Beamwidth: 20 mm String pattern: 18×20, Head size: 100 sq inches Length: 27 inches (standard) Weight: 305 grams unstrung Balance: 32 cm unstrung Beamwidth: 22 mm String pattern: 18×20, Head size: 100 sq inches Length: 27 inches (standard) Weight: 295 grams unstrung Balance: 33 cm Beamwidth: 22 mm String pattern: 16×20. It really will depend on which weight works better for your swings. Your tests are always very informative and non-biased (compared to other play testers). If you feel like my advice is really useful, please consider becoming a patron for $2 at patreon.com/tennisnerd and get exclusive content every week. On my new Gravity Pro I put a Leather grip, Head Super Comp over grip, Primal strings @50 lbs, and a HEAD string dampener. When you think of Head’s rackets you have the Prestige rackets as the signature control rackets, but the Gravity rackets provide similar control with a very different feel. Hi? On the majority of shots, the Gravity Tour stayed pretty solid, but when the ball was really fired at me and I had to hit a difficult volley, it just lacked the kind of stability that separates the very best volleying rackets. Virtually none of us are Tour players or pros, so which rackets should we be looking at? Tks Jonas, I have hit a couple of times with the Tour version and liked it (lighter so more manouverable). We all found the Gravity Tour worked well for us, but there will be some players it doesn’t work for. I really felt like I could pick this racquet up and play a tournament straight away. Also the combination with Head Hawk Touch is just great I was checking your website/ YT-channel and so far no PS98 18/20 2020 test so far, when are going for it? I used speed s & Wilson blade 98s & radical mp. From the baseline it’s great with stability. Hi. I’m currently demoing the Gravity Pro. How does the pro compare with the graphene 360 speed pro. Wilson Racquets Preview: Blade Pro, Blade 102 SW,... https://tennisnerd.net/product/consultation-racquet-and-string-advice. One thing that confuses me with most rackets these days is the names.